Erfahrungen & Bewertungen zu X-GROUP Institut für Gründung, Finanzierung & Geschäftsentwicklung

Why do most founders fail in the second year?

Blog Thumbnails

Inhalt

Knowledge & resources · Germany

Why do most founders fail in the second year?

Original article: 2026-07-08. English translation. Programme details reflect the original publication date.

Why do most founders fail in their second year – and how you can avoid it
Why do most founders deregister their business in the second year? Not because their idea was bad. Not because there was no market. But because they set off with an empty tank – and only realised it halfway through.
Category: Founding & Business Development  |  Author: Daniel Schäfer  |  Reading time: 9 min.

 

I have supported over 4,000 founders and have founded or co-founded more than 40 businesses myself. I know this pattern inside out. And I can tell you: The mistake almost always happens before the business is founded – not afterwards.
In this article, I explain why so many founders have to give up in their second year, what the real reason behind it is – and what you can do specifically to ensure it does not happen to you.
Contents

  1. This is how most business start-ups proceed
  2. The business plan as a compulsory task – and the problem with it
  3. The ship analogy: When the tank runs empty halfway through the journey
  4. What is really behind failure in the second year
  5. The most common mistakes in financial planning
  6. What you should do instead: Anticipate your start-up rather than just experience it
  7. What a realistic financial plan must achieve
  8. What you can do now
  9. Conclusion

This is how most business start-ups proceed

The typical path to self-employment looks like this: Someone is employed, resigns or is made redundant. This is followed by a pre-start-up phase lasting three to seven months. Then comes the first year – and eventually the second.

During this time, there is rarely a truly robust plan for the future. If a financial plan is created at all, it is usually for one reason only: to apply for the start-up grant (Gründungszuschuss) at the employment agency or to convince the bank to provide a loan.
That is the problem. Not the lack of a plan – but the wrong objective behind it.
The business plan as a compulsory task – and the problem with it

If a financial plan is created solely to obtain funding or to convince a bank, it rarely reflects reality. The figures are often calculated optimistically, risks are ignored, costs are forgotten or deliberately understated.

What happens then? The plan serves its purpose – the application is approved, the loan is paid out. But in actual business operations, in the first year, the founder realises: The figures do not match reality. Revenue comes in more slowly. Costs are higher. Reserves are depleted faster than planned.

“A financial plan created only for funding purposes will not protect you from the realities of the market.”
The ship analogy: When the tank runs empty halfway through the journey

Imagine you set sail with your ship. Destination: New York. You are in good spirits, the boat is equipped, the crew is on board. In the middle of the Atlantic – halfway there – you realise: the fuel is almost gone. The water supplies are running low.

What now? You might just be able to paddle back. But you will not reach your destination.

This is exactly what happens to founders in their second year. In the first year, they realise that the plan is not working. The income does not come in as calculated. The fixed costs continue regardless – rent, salaries, insurance, business overheads. The reserves are used up. And without liquidity, a business is just as unable to act as a ship without fuel.

“Insolvency does not mean the idea has failed. It means the tank was empty – before the destination was reached.”
What is really behind failure in the second year

The real reason is almost always the same: during the pre-start-up phase, no financial plan was created that reflected the reality of the future. Or the plan was too optimistic, too incomplete, too focused on funding – instead of on real market conditions.

Banks and funding institutions notice this immediately, by the way. Anyone who reviews hundreds or thousands of business plans daily, who has databases with real industry benchmarks – margins, contribution margins, marketing costs, personnel costs – can see at a glance whether a plan is realistic or not.

So anyone who submits a plan that does not reflect industry reality, that does not include all cost items, that has not planned for a working capital reserve – will not convince anyone. And if they do convince someone, they are only harming themselves.
The most common mistakes in financial planning
Working capital reserve is completely missing
Many founders only plan for the initial investments – the equipment, the software, the first rent. The ongoing costs of the first few months, before significant income is generated, are forgotten or greatly underestimated.
Fixed costs are set too low
Rent, employees, insurance, tax advice, software subscriptions – all of these start from day one. Not only when the first revenue comes in.
Sales forecasts are too optimistic
Many founders calculate as if they will be working at full capacity from month one. In reality, it takes time to acquire customers, build trust, and establish processes.

Contribution margins are calculated incorrectly

Anyone who thinks they will achieve a contribution margin of 10 euros with a product sold for 10 euros is often far off the mark. Materials, packaging, shipping, returns – all of these eat into the margin.

Industry comparisons are missing
A good financial plan looks like the management accounts or balance sheet of a comparable business. Anyone who shows completely different cost structures without justification immediately loses credibility.
What you should do instead: Anticipate your start-up rather than just experience it
There is one crucial difference between founders who give up in the second year and those who succeed: the successful ones have put the first year’s experience before the start-up.

Specifically, this means: before starting your business, you research just as intensively as you would learn to do in your first year of operation – but without burning through your money. You test your product. You talk to potential customers. You check whether they are willing to pay your price. You analyse competitors, understand their unique selling points, and identify where you can differentiate yourself.
And you create a financial plan that is not designed for funding – but for reality.
“The painful lessons of the first year can also be learned before you start your business – without it costing you your livelihood.”
What a realistic financial plan must achieve

A financial plan that truly protects you is more than just a spreadsheet with wishful numbers. It is a reflection of reality – as if you were preparing your tax return retrospectively in three years’ time and had to provide evidence for every figure.
A complete, robust financial plan includes:

  • All cost items – investments, fixed costs, variable costs, private withdrawals
  • A realistic sales and capacity utilisation forecast – not the best-case, but the most likely scenario
  • Working capital reserve for at least 6 months of ongoing costs
  • Profit and loss statement showing a clear surplus
  • Cash flow planning for at least 12 months
  • Industry benchmarks – margins, contribution margins, marketing costs similar to comparable companies
  • Scenarios for risks and challenges

Only once this plan is in place – plausible, complete, and realistic – does it make sense to write the business plan and submit funding applications.

What you can do now

If you are currently in the pre-start-up phase or realise that your existing financial plan does not truly reflect reality – now is the right time to change that.

At X-Group, we help you create a financial plan that is not only suitable for funding applications, but will actually support you through the first years. We know the mistakes, because we have seen them in thousands of projects. And we help you avoid them – before you make them yourself.

Many of our consulting services are eligible for funding via the AVGS voucher or the BAFA funding programme, covering 50 to 100 percent of the costs. This means: professional support without having to pay everything out of your own pocket.

Conclusion: Those who start prepared reach their goal

Most founders do not fail in the second year because of bad ideas. They fail because they started with too little fuel – because the financial plan did not reflect reality, because costs were forgotten, because sales forecasts were too optimistic.

The difference between those who succeed and those who have to give up almost always lies in preparation. Those who learn the lessons of the first year before starting – through research, realistic planning, and a complete financial plan – set off with full tanks, the right crew, and a course that truly leads to the goal.
“Your goal is not to win the funding application. Your goal is to still be there in the third, fourth, and fifth year.”
Do you want to ensure that your financial plan truly reflects reality – and does not just work on paper?
Book your free initial consultation now →

 

 

Teile diesen Beitrag, damit noch mehr Personen von diesem Artikel profitieren können:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Jetzt einen Termin vereinbaren